Sunday, 16 October 2016

Michael Schwartz suspended (suspended)

On the 9th September the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal suspended Michael Schwartz for 5 years for reasons unknown. The suspension is suspended, subject to compliance with the conditions imposed.

This notification relates to a Decision to prosecute before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal. This is an independent Tribunal which reaches its own decision after considering all the evidence, including any evidence put forward by the Respondent. The Tribunal had certified that there was a case to answer.
The matter was heard on 8 and 9 September 2016.
The Tribunal ordered that Mr Schwartz be suspended from practice as a solicitor for a period of 5 years from the 9 September 2016, but that the suspension be suspended for 5 years from the same date subject to compliance with the following restrictions imposed by the Tribunal on the Respondent’s practice as a solicitor. 

During the five year period of suspension the Respondent may not:
1. Practise as a sole practitioner or sole manager or sole owner of an authorised or recognised body;
2. Be a partner or member of a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP), Legal Disciplinary Practice (LDP), or Alternative Business Structure (ABS) or other authorised or recognised body;
3. Be a Compliance Officer for Legal Practice or a Compliance Officer for Finance and Administration;
4. Hold client money;
5. Be a signatory on any client account;
6. Work as a solicitor other than in employment approved by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
The Respondent shall immediately inform any actual or prospective employer of these conditions and the reasons for them.

The Prankster suggests that any person who has information that Michael Schwartz is breaking these conditions contacts the Solicitors Regulatory Authority.

Happy Parking

The Parking Prankster


  1. exactly the same conditions imposed on him several years sago by the SRA , which he has blatantly broken

  2. Full case (25 pages worth!) is here:

  3. The Tribunal ordered that the Respondent should pay costs in the sum of £17,331.00.

    Career over at his age.

  4. From my reading of the matter, he's been suspended (suspended) on account of his being a lying dishonest scumbag, who, when asked about it, lied and was dishonest.

  5. SPA are still after more info , see MSE
    the address for any info is included in that posting

  6. This case dates back a few years, to before the first suspension I believe, so he hasn't breached the terms of that suspension.

  7. all info , on his actions before or after the case is wanted