Printfriendly

Friday, 11 November 2016

Picture of the week. Gladstones issue letter before claim for £17 million

Hapless solicitors Gladstones Solicitors have told Mr Knowles he owes G24 Ltd £17,092,015.


The Prankster understands Mr Knowles will contest the claim.

Happy Parking

The Parking Prankster


Posted by at

17 comments:

  1. Unknown11 November 2016 at 00:53

    I thought you would like that one when I saw it on one of the parking charge Facebook groups. I think it helps prove the lack of human intervention once these things get rolling... From ANPR cameras that can't provide accuracy through to miss-types replacing amounts with something that bears a resemblance to a date... ... 17.09.2015 perhaps?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Unknown11 November 2016 at 01:02

    It's definitely the date of incident. But it's still hysterical that they as "professionals" have made such an error

    ReplyDelete
  3. scalyback11 November 2016 at 01:49

    To put the date instead of the amount on their own letter?
    TWICE?
    Did these people go to school, or just play truant? Please let it go to court!

    ReplyDelete
  4. jezmyers11 November 2016 at 02:16

    I wonder what the court fees on this would be.
    Also, doesn't this make it a little awkward when they claim money for completing these forms, which haven't been compiled by a human?

    ReplyDelete
  5. ManxRed11 November 2016 at 02:37

    What are the court fees for a claim of over £17M?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mick11 November 2016 at 03:34

      Wouldn't be dealt with at county court level that's for sure.

      Delete
  6. Graeme Nicholson11 November 2016 at 04:25

    Probably an error in a mail merge.

    Idiots. wouldn't surprise me to see a few pop up (bulk sendouts)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Unknown11 November 2016 at 05:44

    What a Bunch of Numptys

    ReplyDelete
  8. spacecadet11 November 2016 at 05:49

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  9. spacecadet11 November 2016 at 05:50

    A pretty clear case of harrassment I think- demanding an amount which bears no possible relation to any amount in dispute.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mick11 November 2016 at 08:19

      Hardly. No court is going to take a harassment claim for something like this seriously. It's an obvious admin error, and if followed by a claim would almost certainly be struck out on the court's own initiative.

      Delete
    2. Colin MacDonald12 November 2016 at 00:27

      Indeed, it's a very minor error and could be dealt with easily by a token punitive fine from the court, perhaps a mere 10% of the mis-claimed amount. Who could argue with that?

      Delete
  10. Unknown11 November 2016 at 06:00

    Counter claim for todays date

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Patrick Trouserfire11 November 2016 at 06:35

      But that would only be for £11m, around £6m out of pocket!!

      Delete
    2. ManxRed11 November 2016 at 08:40

      Yeah, wait until a week next Thursday.

      Delete
  11. Castle14 November 2016 at 07:07

    They are still using the old address for Gladstones; so more likely, this is DRP messing up by using the wrong paper.!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Wigsy14 November 2016 at 23:08

    Another one reported on MSE by poster called mad-as-hell on 14th November - this time for £15m. Same originating PPC, and Debt Recovery Plus.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)