Printfriendly

Thursday, 2 February 2017

ParkingEye settle for £110...to motorist

Mr Catfood was an authorised visitor to a site. ParkingEye issued a ticket, and then keep insisting the ticket was valid, despite the land owner asking them to cancel it. POPLA sided with ParkingEye.

ParkingEye filed a claim and Mr Catfood filed a counterclaim.

On 26/6/2016 as a gesture of goodwill, ParkingEye offered to discontinue the case if Mr Catfood paid them £60. He decided not to take advantage of the offer.

On 20/12/2016 as a gesture of goodwill, they offered to discontinue the case if Mr Catfood dropped his counterclaim. He decided not to take advantage of the offer.

On 24/12/16 as a gesture of goodwill, they posted a 500 page bundle of evidence for Mr Catfood to wrap his Christmas presents with and use as hampster bedding.

On 24/1/17 as a gesture of goodwill, ParkingEye offered to pay Mr Catfood £110, and to discontinue their claim. Mr Catfood decided to accept.

Prankster Notes

As a gesture of goodwill, The Prankster has decided to roll around the kitchen floor laughing his head off.

Happy Parking

The Parking Prankster

5 comments:

  1. Do you know what the counterclaim was for?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh boy... My sides are hurting so much... We need to know more about that counterclaim!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I just cannot get over the beauty of all this! I too would love to know more about the counterclaim.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Having read the PH thread, I wonder if the decision to agree to pay the counterclaim without court was as much due to the defendants relationship with ABP, than a sensible decision. I am not so sure the rest of us could expect this result without having to attend.

    ReplyDelete
  5. 500 page bundle !!!!! FFS they are desperate

    ReplyDelete