PCMUK v M. M C3GF45K9 12/12/2016 Clerkenwell
PCMUK v M. M C3GF46K8 12/12/2016 Clerkenwell
Guest court report
There were two PCMUK cases heard in Clerkenwell County Court today, both filed by Gladstones and both resulting from briefly stopping at Hayes and Harlington Station.
First case
Gladstones failed to file their evidence bundle on time. They were given leave to refile their claim. Costs were awarded against the claimant.
Second Case
The second case was lost by Gladstones as the signage they relied upon for forming a contract was too high to be read from a car.
Prankster Note
This is the second time in as many weeks that Gladstones have filed their evidence late regarding this Station. Although the IAS Baristas follow the directions of their leader Bryn Holloway, and refuse to uphold appeals regarding this station, it is clear his instructions are flawed as real judges continue to throw claims out.
It is of course obvious that you cannot form a contract by performance unless you have time to discover, read, understand and accept the contract. This is something Bryn Holloway apparently finds hard to understand, which is why in The Prankster's opinion he is not fit to be the lead assessor of the IAS.
Happy Parking
The Parking Prankster
Bryn Holloway would not get a stand in role with the chuckle brothers.
ReplyDeleteAre there any stats out there on the number of parking cases which get to court which are won and last. It would make interesting reading as to who is winning and losing
ReplyDeleteMost people who report to me have had help and file a defence which raises valid issues. The people who have not had help and file a rubbish defence presumably lose, but do not report back. There were 5 cases at clerkenwell today but I know nothing of the other 3
DeleteAre there any stats out there on the number of parking cases which get to court which are won and last. It would make interesting reading as to who is winning and losing
ReplyDeletedaily court list http://www.bmpa.eu/court.html
ReplyDeleteFor some reason my phone double posts. Yes it seems if a good robust defence is put in a win is pretty much on the table despite the court lottery system. If poor defence then a loss can happen. Of course there will be many undefended ones where the person is not even aware.
ReplyDelete