ParkingEye v Mr G, 11/07/2014, Norwich.
ParkingEye's case depended extensively on ParkingEye v Beavis, but the judge was aware that ParkingEye were misrepresenting the situation. Although ParkingEye did not mention the case was being appealed the judge was fully appraised of the true situation and therefore stayed the case until the appeal result was over.
Happy Parking
The Parking Prankster
Putting the fun back into parking
Click for guide to fighting ParkingEye court claims
Click for help with low-cost appeals and court defences
No comments:
Post a Comment