BW Legal are still filing claims for parking events at Albert Street, Birmingham, on behalf of Vehicle Control Services. This is despite the fact that Vehicle Control Services do not appear on the signage, and therefore there can be no possible claim that a contract existed between themselves and the motorist.
This is trite law.
VCS and BW Legal have discontinued all claims where this point has been filed as a defence, including:
VCS v Zozulya A8QZ6666
VCS v Ms M 3QZ53955
VCS v Ms O C8DP9D8C
VCS v Mr H C2DP0H7C
VCS v Mr W C1DP3H5V
VCS v Ms C C8DP37CH
By their actions they therefore appear to be well aware there is no valid claim. This does not stop them filing new claims anyway, presumably in the hope that the defendant does not bring this point up and pays before a hearing. If the claim goes to a hearing, presumably they hope the judge is having an off day and does not notice the signage is not in their name.
The Prankster questions the ethics and morals of Sean Barton, CEO of BW Legal, in allowing his company to file claims when they know there is no standing to bring the claim. The Prankster has asked Mr Barton if he wishes to comment on his reprehensible actions.
Vehicle Control Services are a member of the International Parking Community (IPC), The IPC have stated they will take no action on this matter.
Happy Parking
The Parking Prankster
Putting the fun back into parking
Click for guide to fighting ParkingEye court claims
Click for help with low-cost appeals and court defences
Why can't he be reported to the SRA.
ReplyDeleteBW are doing as instructed by VCS , how many solicitors/barristers would defend a mass murderer in court , its there job
ReplyDeleteSurely a counterclaim for misuse of data would mean they couldn't discontinue and it would be heard in SSC
ReplyDeleteIsn't this fraud - if you know you have no valid claim but still make the claim?
ReplyDeleteThe claim against me at this site was held even though I raised this point at the hearing. The Judge said something along the lines of 'Although the signage was inconsistent, the matter of who you had to pay seems of little relevance...'. Yeah, I know ..
ReplyDelete