Wednesday, 13 November 2013

BPA Sanction points, October 2013

Not much to report. The BPA are dodging the issue time after time and The Prankster has seen many complaints which are deflected without any action being taken. If the BPA want to convince the public that the dodgy clamper element has been removed they will need to take firmer action.

A step in the right direction would be to make all complaints and the resulting enquires made public. That way, the public would be able to see for themselves what is actually happening.

Sanction points issued - October 2013
OperatorNumber of points issuedReason
GG441Sanction   2012 - 1.3 Failure to comply with the requests of the BPA or their agents   within the specified timescale 
SS881Sanction   2012 - 1.3 Failure to comply with the requests of the BPA or their agents   within the specified timescale 
RR551Sanction   2012 - 1.3 Failure to comply with the requests of the BPA or their agents   within the specified timescale 
PP661Sanction   2012 - 1.3 Failure to comply with the requests of the BPA or their agents   within the specified timescale 
VV881Sanction   2012 - 1.3 Failure to comply with the requests of the BPA or their agents   within the specified timescale 
KK221Sanction   2012 - 1.3 Failure to comply with the requests of the BPA or their agents   within the specified timescale 
Sanction points issued - September 2013
OperatorNumber of points issuedReason
YY661Sanction 2012 - 1.3 Failure to comply with the requests of the BPA or their agents within the specified timescale - 1 Point
WW333Sanction 2012 - 3.3 Major contravention on signs and/or notices - 3 Points
Sanction points issued - August 2013
OperatorNumber of points issuedReason
NN993Sanction 2012 - 3.3 Major contravention on signs and/or notices - 3 Points
at

5 comments:

  1. SiteGuru13 November 2013 at 03:59

    Apologies if it's mentioned elsewhere - is the a look-up table of Operator codes to operator?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. DP13 November 2013 at 04:02

      I think they actually change the codes every month - so not only do you not know who each code is, you don't know if it's the same operator from one month to the next.

      I'm sure the Prankster will correct me if i'm wrong on that.

      Delete
    2. Parking Prankster13 November 2013 at 04:08

      They change the codes each offence! I have a post which shows an operator got suspended for racking up 58 sanction points. Most of those were awarded in one go, in one month. However, they all got separate operator codes.

      Delete
    3. DP13 November 2013 at 04:52

      This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. DP13 November 2013 at 04:54

      It's amazing anyone could manage to rack up that many points, given how unwilling the BPA have become to dish out sanction points.

      I was recently in dialogue with them after reporting what was clearly, to any reasonable person, blatant and serious misrepresentation by one of their approved operators on their signage (which, let's not forget, they argue forms part of a legally binding contract).

      Outcome: BPA perfectly happy with the actions of the operator, no case to answer.

      Delete