tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3050188067980163727.post8277743322937979655..comments2024-02-21T09:25:42.645-08:00Comments on Parking Prankster: Mr Duff needs help for judicial reviewParking Pranksterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15270922602703929291noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3050188067980163727.post-89451193995735631202015-01-05T04:55:56.366-08:002015-01-05T04:55:56.366-08:00When's the JR to take place?When's the JR to take place?Fractious Tarthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18121510469285069560noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3050188067980163727.post-41219208746867306172014-12-23T11:38:54.898-08:002014-12-23T11:38:54.898-08:00Correct - But none of this is relevant to the Judi...Correct - But none of this is relevant to the Judicial Review proceedings though ;)cjdenverhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04812650106818623551noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3050188067980163727.post-41747514798931325122014-12-23T03:38:28.281-08:002014-12-23T03:38:28.281-08:00The costs will horrific.
I can't see how he ca...The costs will horrific.<br />I can't see how he can slap a ticket on a vehicle for trespass when the operative can polity just ask the driver to move along instead. MITIGATION of loss to the landowner is the key phrase. I would use the Wickes v Ibbitson case as authority and take a special package of a toothbrush to hand over to Duff's lawyer since the lies told by Duff are perhaps doubly scandalous.<br /><br />Trespass is more than just happening to be on private land, which you are probably visiting on business anyway. It has to involve an element of uninvited entry to the land.Fractious Tarthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18121510469285069560noreply@blogger.com