tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3050188067980163727.post779051767935863045..comments2024-02-21T09:25:42.645-08:00Comments on Parking Prankster: ParkingEye ignore judge's directions for re-hearing. Get spanked. Bargepole wins againParking Pranksterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15270922602703929291noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3050188067980163727.post-79847860880150068302014-05-13T07:54:11.865-07:002014-05-13T07:54:11.865-07:00It appears to be all part of a greater tactic of i...It appears to be all part of a greater tactic of introducing a blizzard of paperwork, both overwhelming and confusing to the defendant and hopefully for them, the judge. Unfortunately this blizzard is obviously also difficult for their own representatives and employees to keep track of and understand. The simple fact is, these cases should be basic, easy to understand and easy to argue. ParkingEye make it difficult which detracts from the simplicity of the law that is governing over the decision. <br /><br />Do you have the right to bring a claim? <br />Is the amount you claim legal and justified? <br />Have you followed your own rules and that of your governing body? <br />Was Court the final choice? <br />Have you correctly followed Practice Direction?<br /><br />If you can answer yes to all those, congratulations the money is yours...<br /><br />I've seen other types of cases argued for many thousands with nothing more than a few invoices/receipts, emails and 2 parties giving their side.<br /><br />PE can't complain when Defendants do look for help online even though they try to. After all they pay LPC for help and as witnessed here and in the comments still get it wrong. I'm sure they would prefer all their defendants to be unarmed!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05685013539715517149noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3050188067980163727.post-56494824296660578992014-05-13T03:45:32.850-07:002014-05-13T03:45:32.850-07:00There is no commercial issues here. The whole argu...There is no commercial issues here. The whole arguement is based on commerical value of an invoice and legal right to charge said amount. No contract available to prove both salient points is invalid in my eyes. Any attempt to circumvent these requirements needs to be exposed and fully justified. One wonders if they can't, a bit like no genuine pre-estimate of loss.Custard Piehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04991326855766539410noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3050188067980163727.post-10824748300472778022014-05-12T23:59:42.278-07:002014-05-12T23:59:42.278-07:00The Parking Eye lot are amateurs....in our case th...The Parking Eye lot are amateurs....in our case they submitted a right old miss mash of documentation, nothing indexed, all in the wrong order, incorrectly labelled documents, things crossed out and hand written annotations put in their place. They even supplied me with a heavily redacted contract prior to the case. The LPC rep strenuously denied this until the Judge offered her a copy of the contract they'd also sent to him ! Talk about the left not knowing what the right is doing. It doesn't take the best brains in the world, to work out that, legal arguments aside, this must create a terrible impression in court. Laughable thing is, a schoolboy could fix it. Well done Mr P and Mr P, and to the dependent who had the guts to stand up to these nasty little bullies.The Dudehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03094393713034061104noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3050188067980163727.post-53163149929189331412014-05-12T23:56:12.237-07:002014-05-12T23:56:12.237-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.The Dudehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03094393713034061104noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3050188067980163727.post-17609932940752503122014-05-12T23:29:48.034-07:002014-05-12T23:29:48.034-07:00I can feel the ground move..........
Word is getti...I can feel the ground move..........<br />Word is getting out........Fractious Tarthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18121510469285069560noreply@blogger.com