tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3050188067980163727.post7467429255587476564..comments2024-02-21T09:25:42.645-08:00Comments on Parking Prankster: ES Parking lose yet another Spinningfield caseParking Pranksterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15270922602703929291noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3050188067980163727.post-91546316649352749642017-01-19T01:17:26.788-08:002017-01-19T01:17:26.788-08:00"The judge also ruled the signage is incorrec..."The judge also ruled the signage is incorrect - the signs state that the private land is managed by ES Parking Enforcement Ltd but it is not, the land is managed by Spinningfields Estate."<br /><br />I've picked up on this thinking with the PCM signage on the estate where I live. The signs claim that PCM Manages and Operates the Private Land. That is simply untrue. They don't mow the lawn, nor do they keep the lights on etc. I want to argue that based on that language on their sign, I did not see their sign to be a genuine offer and that all other terms can be ignored. IE If one part of the "offer" is clearly untrue, why should the rest of the offer be taken seriously?<br />I don't know how this would stand the test in front of a judge though.rjshookhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08936443235281593022noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3050188067980163727.post-19994636523856009322017-01-18T19:00:11.941-08:002017-01-18T19:00:11.941-08:00The Judge was not happy at all with ES asking him ...The Judge was not happy at all with ES asking him why he has brought so many cases using the exact same defence and not dealing with each case by their own merits.<br /><br />In think this needs amending. ES are the claimant not the defendant. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02128343662019159151noreply@blogger.com