tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3050188067980163727.post3067758642687399665..comments2024-02-21T09:25:42.645-08:00Comments on Parking Prankster: Is Bryn Holloway Lead Assessor of the Independent Appeals Service corrupt or incompetent?Parking Pranksterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15270922602703929291noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3050188067980163727.post-13998206374861620672018-02-07T05:06:20.475-08:002018-02-07T05:06:20.475-08:00Interesting blog. Have to say that POPLA are no be...Interesting blog. Have to say that POPLA are no better. Just had an appeal refused. Appeal detailed operators failings and relevant case law that upholds the arguments. You guessed it no relevant case law commented on. Even worse I have seen a similar decision in nother blog here.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15318572737400699522noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3050188067980163727.post-65490147013440959922017-12-17T22:41:55.047-08:002017-12-17T22:41:55.047-08:00It was a Pepipoo case, Peter came to the forums fo...It was a Pepipoo case, Peter came to the forums for the initial advice and was supported right through tonthe HC appeal. At that time even the PNLD stated posting in 14 days despite the self evident wording of the statute. Much like the relevant part of PoFA, and it's surely no coincidence that the same 14 days is used.Simon Rookhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09825602901278159485noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3050188067980163727.post-38020233503261283742017-12-17T22:37:28.706-08:002017-12-17T22:37:28.706-08:00This comment has been removed by the author.Simon Rookhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09825602901278159485noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3050188067980163727.post-30249148865441831582017-12-17T22:34:14.898-08:002017-12-17T22:34:14.898-08:00Competent solicitors should know about it, it rela...Competent solicitors should know about it, it related to serving a speeding NIP within 14 days, Gideon v Chief Constable of North Humberside http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2009/2924.htmlSimon Rookhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09825602901278159485noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3050188067980163727.post-64443226732666410542017-12-17T11:54:59.097-08:002017-12-17T11:54:59.097-08:00An obscure high court appeal in some obscure count...An obscure high court appeal in some obscure country? Or a high profile case which competent solicitors and barristers (acting in an area where the definitions or send and received are crucial) would be expected to be familiar with?Parking Pranksterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15270922602703929291noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3050188067980163727.post-51112354877651677532017-12-17T10:58:03.180-08:002017-12-17T10:58:03.180-08:00To be fair, it took a high court appeal to convinc...To be fair, it took a high court appeal to convince the Police and Magistrates courts that sent and received were not the same thing.....Simon Rookhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09825602901278159485noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3050188067980163727.post-15033747631954182702017-12-17T05:26:04.184-08:002017-12-17T05:26:04.184-08:00Well, at least now we know what Bryn needs for Chr...Well, at least now we know what Bryn needs for Christmas.<br /><br />A Dictionary!<br /><br />That way, he'll be able to work out that "Sent" and "Received" do not mean the same.<br /><br />We know that the English language can be a bit of a complicated beast, but this is pretty basic so even a beginners "Janet & John" type dictionary should be able to help him out with this.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13372437231010475357noreply@blogger.com